To What Extent Is There a Democratic Deficit in the Uk?

establishment & Politics Essay To what extent is there a democratic deficit in the UK? at that place is an personal line of credit that the government has the power and right to change laws and represent large sum without necessarily having to be select. This can withal be known as Democratic deficit. An object lesson of democratic deficit is the put up of Lords. The members in the House of Lords argonnt elected but they recover to prevail laws and represent the people. The members in House of Lords are usu wholey given their seats hereditarily so many people found it unfair that theyre non elected into the Parliament but they can make decisions and laws on our behalf.On the other hand, people whitethorn contest with the fact that there is the House of special K as well as the House of Lords and the House of Commons has more(prenominal) power than the House of Lords has. H of C can make laws and policies without consulting H of L, whereas H of L has to consolidate H of C with the policy or law they want to pass. There has also been whatever sort of reform in the H of L to make it fairer, there are only 92 hereditary lords left in the H of L so people whitethorn say this is an example of the UK not macrocosm a democratic deficit. In this essay I will be assessing for and against views of the UK being a democratic deficit. whatsoever people agree with this view that there is a democratic deficit in the UK because as I mentioned earlier the members in House of Lords arent elected, the head of state (Queen) can nail down whether or not laws can be passed and practiced in the UK but shes not elected and can reign as long as she stays alive for which some people pay off unfair because the laws she passes affects them. Another example of Democratic deficit is the European Union who makes regulations and decisions that has an effect on all the countries across Europe which includes the UK.Some people think this is unfair because they make decisions t hat affect the way we live in the UK and they mothernt even been elected to do so however others may say that they may not be elected but they do make laws and decisions that help the UK such as health, education, hearty security and social services. The EU being an example of democratic deficit can be argued twain ways one being bad for people because they can make laws that the people dont like but they drive to follow them regardless and the other being the fact that the EU makes laws that helps the surface area as a whole such as education and health.Judges can be said to be an example of democratic deficit because they arent elected by the people but they can make decisions that affect peoples lives. Judges can direct a verdict, they can interpret and go through the law and they can even make laws in some cases and all without even being elected. Some people may see this as unfair because judges can be biased and judgemental and condemnation someone to more years than the y deserve because they know that they cant be fired.However, some people may disaccord with this because judges do whats best for the society and for the people and if they didnt excoriate harshly or fairly, reprehensibles would be out in the public repeating their acts. However, some people may argue against this by saying that there are juries there in the court to make sure enough that the sentencing is fair and the trial isnt sabotaged or biased. Juries also give their verdict on how they found the criminal/defendant so the decision isnt fully dependent on the judge. Low participation rank in the UK are one of the features of democratic deficit.In the 2010 general elections more than 16 million% of people could have voted but chose not to. The overall end product in the UK as a whole was 65%. In 2005 the voting turnout was 61% approximately, which means over a period of 5 years the office has risen by 4% over the UK. This shows that there is an in fact low participation localize in the UK and this is due to situations such as initial Past the Post. On the other hand, others may disagree because the turnout of participation has increased in the last two general elections. In 2001 the overall turnout of participation was 59%, and in 2005 the overall turnout of participation was 61%.This shows that the participation in the UK is rising. There is also some other forms of participation in the UK that have increased such as boycotting, petitions etc. These have gone up over the past years with more people becoming more interested in politics. FPTP is an electoral voting system based on constituencies, for a society to learn a general election outright they must win an absolute majority of constituencies. FPTP is used for elections to the House of Commons. FPTP has some advantages like the results can be calculated quickly and makes the transfer of power from one party to another much easier.However, it also has some disadvantages like smaller parties are disadvantaged because the number of votes they get isnt reflected in the number of seats they gain. Also, tactical voting which is not voting for a preferred party but to defeat a bad party or to vote for a least bad one will become more likely and there will be pinched votes which is a vote that doesnt affect the outcome of the election either because its for a losing prognosis or because a candidate already has lots of votes which can lead to voter apathy.This can be seen as unfair because third parties are usually disadvantaged because of the number of seats they get compared to the number of votes and because some voters votes may not be counted because it is for the losing candidate or because the candidate already has enough votes. This gives voters close to tactically vote instead. As you can see throughout the essay there have been a lot of arguments for and against the view that the UK is becoming a democratic deficit.However, for arguments have seemed to outweigh against arguments by a cm. We have heard that House of Lords not being elected, the Head of State, The EU, Judges, Low participation rates and voting turnouts, and First Past the Past have all been examples of why there is a democratic deficit in the UK, while Juries, Increased turnout rates, Forms of participation increased, House of Commons, and reform of House of Lords have all been examples of why there isnt a democratic deficit in the UK.In my opinion, I think that the UK does have a democratic deficit and my reasons for thinking so are revealed in this essay. I think the UK does have a democratic deficit in the UK but it only has it to a certain extent which is where the arguments against it balance it to not make it a democratic deficit.